Meaningful use Archives

'Meaningful Use' Eludes Providers

 

Health-care providers still have a lot of work to do to meet key health IT requirements expected under the government's Stage 2 "meaningful use" standard, a new industry report finds.

CSC, an IT consulting firm based in Falls Church, Va., says the following essential areas require immediate attention:

  • Electronic patient access to personal health information.

  • Electronic capture of physician notes, including diagnosis and treatment, and rationale for excluding patients from treatment recommendations.

  • Electronic exchange of patient information from one provider to another.
"The importance of these requirements goes beyond meeting the incentives for meaningful use," writes CSC's Erica Drazen, author of "Moving Ahead with Stage 2 of Meaningful Use." Patients need access to their records to become accountable for their care, she writes, and accountability of providers rests on their being able to share patient information with one another.

Only 12 percent of hospital chief information officers in a survey said they were prepared to allow patients to view and download their information; 24 percent said they couldn't yet transmit summary-of-care records when a patient left the hospital. And only 25 percent said they can meet proposed Stage 2 requirements for electronic physician notes.

The problem is twofold, they said: vendor products and operational readiness.

Expected Stage 2 goals for electronic medication administration (eMar) have been easier to reach, with 86 percent of the survey's respondents saying they are prepared to implement eMar in at least one hospital unit, as required.

The report combines information from early attesters to meaningful use with results of a survey of CIOs belonging to the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives.

Final rules for Stage 2 meaningful use are supposed to be published in July, but a delay is likely because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services missed a December 2011 target date for releasing an early version of the rules.

Health IT Czar: Five Things You Need to Know

 

The nation's health IT czar polished off his crystal ball this week and predicted five major health IT trends for the year. Dr. Farzad Mostashari, national coordinator for health IT, shared the prognostications on his office's Health IT Buzz blog:

  • Meaningful use takes off. Mostashari projects that at least 100,000 providers will demonstrate that their electronic health records meet ONC standards for "meaningful use" by the end of the year, enabling them to receive Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments.

  • Health information exchanges turn a corner. "ONC efforts are critical," he writes. "Robust policies that protect information and create public trust will galvanize rapid growth and innovation in health information exchange.

  • The dots connect between health IT and payment reform. Pay-for-service models lead to higher costs, he argues, just as health IT helps hospitals and practices to move away from traditional pay models. "We are headed toward a virtuous cycle where payment reform improves the business case for using health IT and greater use of health IT improves the chances that new payment models will succeed."

  • Consumers take advantage of eHealth resources. Mobile apps and other technological advances make it easier for patients to become more involved in improving their health, Mostashari says.

  • Innovation drives improvement. Efforts in 2012 will focus on improving the usability of EHRs, he says.
2012 will be the year in which health IT "truly comes of age," Mostashari predicts.

Mostashari: Greatest Hits of 2011

 

Here are the top 10 developments in health IT for 2011, straight from the national coordinator for health IT. Dr. Farzad Mostashari released the month-by-month list Jan. 6 on his Health IT Buzz blog:

  • January: Medicare and Medicaid electronic health record incentive programs launched. Since then, "the marketplace of certified products has grown quickly, interest in meaningful use among providers and hospitals is sky-high, and the pace of incentive payments has continued to accelerate," Mostashari said. More than $1.8 billion in incentives had been paid to more than 20,000 health-care providers and 1,200 hospitals as of Nov. 30.

  • February: ONC launched Direct Project, providing "a simple, secure, standards-based way for providers and other participants to send encrypted health information directly to trusted recipients over the Internet - a kind of 'health email,'" Mostashari said. Multiple vendors and states are implementing the system.

  • March: The Health and Human Services Department, ONC's parent agency, released its National Quality Strategy, a framework to guide efforts to improve health-care, with health IT as a critical component.

  • April: The "Summer of Standards" kicked off, a series of standards and interoperability forums to support Stage 2 standards and certification requirements for EHR incentive programs, resulting in consensus being reached on the Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture. Mostashari described the architecture as a "single, broadly supported electronic data standard for patient care transitions."

  • June: The Investing in Innovations (i2) program used challenges and prizes to promote innovations in health IT. Several i2 challenges have been launched since, including a call to create applications "activating and empowering patients to improve their heart health."

  • July: Health IT training curriculum was released on the open market in July. Employment continued growing in the health IT workforce, which added more than 50,000 jobs between 2008 and 2010, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

  • September: HHS' Office for Civil Rights issued its first report to Congress on breaches of protected health information. Breaches now must be reported to HHS, those affected, and in some cases the news media.

  • September: ONC formally launched its Consumer e-Health Program, with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention proposing regulations making it easier for patients to access lab data. More than 250 organizations covering more than 100 million people, including Aetna, the Mayo Clinic and AARP, have "agreed to make health information easily available to consumers," Mostashari said.

  • October: ONC's 62 Regional Extension Centers passed their goals to enroll 100,000 "priority" primary-care providers nationwide, and by mid-December had enrolled 116,000 providers requesting help with EHR implementation, including 70 percent of rural primary-care providers.

  • November: A CDC survey of office-based physicians showed the percentage of nonhospital-based physicians with a basic EHR doubled from 17 percent in 2008 to 34 percent in 2011, with nearly 40 percent of primary-care physicians adopting an EHR. The proportion of hospitals operating EHRs with the functionality required in the Medicare and Medicaid incentive programs rose from 2 percent to 41 percent, among hospitals eligible for the incentives.

Hospitals Tracking Tech Anew

 

Electronic health records top a list of 10 technologies hospitals need to watch in 2012, according to a report released today by ECRI Institute.

"Technology is increasingly a top management concern, and is no longer confined to clinical and technical decision making. Themes emerging on our 2012 list reflect ongoing impacts of health-care reform initiatives and new technology developments that emphasize patient-centered care," says Jeffrey C. Lerner, president and CEO of ECRI Institute, in a news release. ECRI, based in Plymouth Meeting, Pa., is an independent, not-for-profit organization that focuses on improving health care.

Hospitals need to focus on meeting Stage 2 meaningful-use criteria this year to continue qualifying for federal health IT reimbursements, the organization notes in its report, "ECRI Institute's Top 10 C-Suite Watch List: Hospital Technology Issues for 2012."

The report cites Stage 2 criteria including:

  • Increasing the threshold for computerized physician order entry from 30 percent under Stage 1 criteria to 60 percent.

  • Requiring that vital signs be recorded electronically for 80 percent of patients, up from 50 percent under Stage 1.

  • Recording how the patient prefers to receive communications.

  • Enabling Web-based access to inpatient records.
"Stage 2 certification requires hospitals to not only have the necessary IT infrastructure, but also the ability to integrate patient care device data into the electronic health record (EHR) -- either directly or through an intermediary system," the report says. "In what is now often referred to as medical device integration, hospitals are challenged with defining which devices are critical priorities and which ones might be necessary in the future."

After developing a medical-device integration plan, hospitals will have to determine how they will share the information with health information exchanges, the report notes. "The IT challenges, as well as contractual issues (e.g., with your state or regional health information exchange) related to integration seem unending."

The report is available, with registration, through the ECRI Institute website.

Biggest Health IT Losers of 2012?

 

As you resolve not to smoke, overeat or work too much in 2012, the website SearchHealthIT issues its list of five health IT trends not to watch in the new year:

  • Electronic medical records: EMRs are generally in-house records for tracking patient data and improving quality of care. It's electronic health records, which can be shared among caregivers and accessed electronically by patients, that bear watching, website editor Brian Eastwood writes in a blog post.

  • Personal health records: The market doesn't seem to be going anywhere right now, and questions are being raised about privacy.

  • Hospital information systems and clinical information systems: Like EMRs, the data compiled by these systems is not easily shared among providers or through a health information exchange.

  • Computerized physician order entry: Adoption is low, in part because they're geared toward hospitals, not the physicians using them. They're "slow to adapt to the tablet PCs and smartphones that physicians have more than happily embraced," Eastwood writes.

  • Regional health information organizations: While more than 250 of these organizations exist nationwide, the terminology and its acronym (RHIO) appear to be going out of fashion.

ONC to Track Grant Recipients

 

If you were preoccupied last week with the seasonal imperative to give gifts, you may have missed an announcement, put out by the Office of the National Coordinator, that its gifts come with strings attached.

ONC announced in the Federal Register that it would create databases to track, monitor and assess the performance of individuals who receive grants intended to promote development of an interoperable system for sharing health information.

The "ONC Health IT Dashboard" will assess the progress of providers who receive incentive funds to spur the "meaningful use" of electronic health records as well as providers who participate in other health IT programs, including regional extension centers.

The program will take effect within 30 days, according to the announcement.

Blue Cross Backs ONC's Outreach

 

The country's largest consortium of health insurance providers has publicly endorsed federal initiatives that promote consumers' awareness of health IT.

"Health information technology has the power to transform the way healthcare is delivered and significantly increase safety, efficiency and the quality of care for all Americans," the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association said in a statement released Dec. 22.

The association, a national federation of 39 independent, community-based and locally operated Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies, "strongly supports initiatives to advance health information technology and ... efforts by the Office of the National Coordinator 'to engage and empower individuals to be partners in their health through information technology.'"

Moreover, the association is encouraging others to follow its lead, calling on "entities that touch Americans' lives to pledge to empower individuals to be partners in their health through health IT."

The association says it and its companies have been "at the forefront" of efforts to promote broad adoption of health IT. It cited a record of developing national standards for personal health records, promoting health-care providers' use of electronic prescribing and electronic medial records, and advancing the health care sector's adoption of interoperable health IT.

"Our shared vision for the future of healthcare in America includes the use of health information technology to drive safer and better care for all Americans," the association said in the news release. "We look forward to working with the administration and others to help promote consumer awareness and engagement in health IT."

Social Docs Share Health IT Tips

 

A group of physicians is using the latest social-media technology to help demystify health information technology that is overwhelming many of their medical colleagues.

The heart of the project is a new website designed to "serve as a trusted resource for doctors who are contemplating or are in the midst of transforming their practices or institutions using health information technology to improve health and health care," according to the nonprofit organization's mission statement.

The Doctors Helping Doctors Transform Healthcare initiative got off the ground on Dec. 1 in Washington. A webcast featured panels of physicians who shared stories of health IT implementation. Dr. Farzad Mostashari, national coordinator for health IT, and Dr. Richard Baron, director of the seamless care models group at the federal government's Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, weighed in, as well.

The idea is to "help physicians--operating in a diverse range of settings, from small physician practices to large integrated delivery systems-learn about the value of health IT from their peers; point them to a set of resources that will not only help them make the transition to health IT, but also optimize its use to support high quality, cost-effective care delivery; and facilitate a dialogue on best practices, key challenges, and methods to overcome those challenges," the group said on its website.

The website features articles and short videos about topics including electronic health record benefits, meaningful use and EHR implementation, and a blog by doctors sharing their experiences with EHRs. It also includes links to additional resources. Doctors will talk about why they decided to adopt health IT, the strategies they used to overcome challenges, how their practices were affected and the lessons they learned, according to a news release announcing the initiative.

"We all started as EHR novices, and through our collective four decades of experience have probably made every mistake that anyone could make (and more than once)," Dr. Peter Basch, an internist and one of the founding physicians of the group and the initial chair, wrote in the inaugural blog post. He is medical director of ambulatory EHR and health IT policy for MedStar Health in Washington.

Other founding members are Dr. William Bria, chief medical information officer at Shriners Hospitals for Children and president of the Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems; Dr. Michael Zaroukian, chief medical information officer at Michigan State University and medical director of clinical informatics and care transformation at Sparrow Health System; and Janet Marchibroda, chair of the Health IT Initiative at the Bipartisan Policy Center and the Doctors Helping Doctors' initial executive director.

The initiative has received grants from the Chan Soon-Shiong Family Foundation, the Optum Institute for Sustainable Health and Siemens Healthcare.

Several professional medical organizations also have joined as collaborators. They are the American College of Cardiology, the American College of Physicians, American EHR Partners, the American Osteopathic Association, the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems.

HHS Eases 'Meaningful Use' Cutoff

 

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is relaxing its timetable for health-care providers to meet stricter standards for "meaningful use" of electronic health records, a move HHS says is intended to speed and ease adoption of health IT.

Doctors and hospitals that began participating in Medicare EHR incentive programs this year have another year, until 2014, to meet the second stage of standards for meaningful use, HHS said in an announcement released this week. Providers that adopt EHRs in 2012 would continue to have until 2014 to meet Stage 2 meaningful-use standards.

Health-care providers whose EHRs meet meaningful-use standards are eligible for up to $44,000 in Medicare incentives and $63,750 in Medicaid incentives, so meeting those standards is critical. But health IT organizations and industry professionals have urged for several months that the deadline for meeting tougher, Stage 2 meaningful-use standards be pushed back to 2014. Dr. Farzad Mostashari, the national coordinator for health IT, recently agreed with those recommendations.

The HHS-announced delay also presumably gives Mostashari's office more time to settle on its requirements for Stage 2 meaningful-use standards.

HHS also intends to offer education and training to doctors and hospitals that have registered for EHR incentive programs through Medicare and Medicaid--but have not yet achieved meaningful use. The outreach will complement the efforts of regional extension centers, local nonprofit groups that help smaller practices and hospitals navigate the world of health IT, HHS said.

Meaningful Use Eludes Radiologists

 

Six out of 10 radiologists plan to use electronic health records and achieve "meaningful use" standards, but only 6 percent think they have a good understanding of what meaningful use means, a new study shows.

Nearly 40 percent of 216 radiologists surveyed by the health-care vendor consulting firm KLAS said they either don't understand federal meaningful use guidelines or they worry that the use of EHRs could create new inefficiencies.

"These numbers should be a wake-up call for the radiology industry," said Emily Crane, research director for KLAS and author of the study, "Radiologists' Take on Meaningful Use," conducted by KLAS and the Radiological Society of North America.

The results are disappointing because most radiologists are eligible for "some or all" of the $44,000 incentive available to health-care providers that achieve EHR meaningful use, Crane said. She noted that providers will be penalized if they don't achieve meaningful use by 2015.

Some of the respondents said they did not believe current meaningful-use guidelines take radiology into consideration. They argued for including clinical decision support, especially for referring physicians, to ensure the correct imaging test is ordered, KLAS said in a news release.

Radiologists were unenthusiastic about giving patients the ability to access electronic records or to track radiation doses, according to the release.